The petitioner seeks relief from the district court’s order of November 18, 2025.

On January 27, 2026, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause why the district court did not err in granting the People’s motion to transfer the defendant from DYS custody to adult jail.  The respondents are directed to file an answer by February 24, 2026.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the district court’s order of December 22, 2025.

On January 21, 2026, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause why the district court did not err in denying the petitioner’s request to conduct discovery prior to the immediate possession hearing.  The respondent is directed to file an answer by February 18, 2026.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the postconviction court’s orders of December 1 and December 3, 2025.

On December 12, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause why the postconviction court did not err in granting the respondent’s request to serve the petition for relief on the public defender.  The respondent is directed to file an answer by January 9, 2026.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of October 22, 2025.

On October 24, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the petitioner’s motion to preclude expert testimony.  The respondent is directed to file an answer by November 21, 2025.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of September 4, 2025.

On October 15, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause why the trial court did not err in declaring a mistrial after the jury indicated that it was unanimous as to the charged offenses but deadlocked as to the lesser included offenses.  The respondents are directed to file an answer by November 12, 2025.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of June 30, 2025.

On October 14, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause why the district court did not err in finding that the respondent had satisfactorily alleged the required elements for a condemnation action, including the authority to condemn easements across the petitioner’s property.  The respondent is directed to file a written answer by November 11, 2025.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the postconviction court’s order of May 23, 2025.

On August 26, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause why the postconviction court did not err in finding that it lacked authority to order the prosecution to provide trial discovery to the defense.  The respondent is directed to file a written answer by September 23, 2025.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer to reply.

The petitioners seek relief from the district court’s order of June 13, 2025.

On July 17, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause why the district court did not err in denying the petitioners’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer by August 14, 2025.  The petitioners have 21 days from receipt of the answer to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the district court’s order of May 27, 2025.

On June 26, 2025, the Supreme Court issued an order to show cause why the district court did not err in ruling that a violation of a protection order can serve as the predicate offense for second-degree burglary.  The respondent is directed to file a written answer by July 24, 2025.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer to reply.