The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s orders of August 17, 2022, and September 23, 2022.

On October 28, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in ordering mediation.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before November 25, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of November 21, 2022.

On January 23, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for a restorability hearing.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before February 21, 2023.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

This matter was dismissed at the request of parties on February 15, 2023.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s orders of March 9, 2022, and May 10, 2022.

On May 20, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in granting the defendant’s motion for a bifurcated trial.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before June 17, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of May 10, 2022.

On May 20, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in granting the defendant’s motion for a bifurcated trial.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before June 17, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of July 26, 2022. 

On August 19, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the petitioner’s request for a preliminary hearing.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before September 16, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of January 20, 2023.

On January 27, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the petitioner’s motion to dismiss and finding that the notice requirement in the CARES Act had expired.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before February 24, 2023.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

Opinion issued May 15, 2023

The petitioners seek relief from the juvenile court’s order of July 28, 2022.

On September 1, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the juvenile court did not err in granting Mother’s motion for a directed verdict.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before September 29, 2022.  The petitioners have 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court's Order of November 16, 2022.
On January 17, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress.  The respondents are directed to file a written Answer on or before February 14, 2023.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the Answer within which to Reply.

Opinion issued October 16, 2023

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of May 27, 2022.

On June 14, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for change of venue.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before July 12, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioners seek relief from the trial court’s orders of June 30, 2022, and July 27, 2022.

On August 23, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in (1) setting aside the default judgment, and (2) granting the defendant’s motion to change venue.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before September 13, 2022.  The petitioners have 7 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s orders of August 15, 2022, and September 2, 2022.

On September 7, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in (1) denying the petitioner’s motion to quash a subpoena requiring him to sit for a deposition, and (2) denying the petitioner’s motion for a protective order.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before October 5, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of August 1, 2022.

On August 10, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in refusing to require the plaintiff to appropriate funds to pay the defendant’s attorney’s fees.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before September 7, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply..

The petitioner seeks relief from the district court’s order of January 13, 2022.

On April 1, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the district court did not err in adopting the magistrate’s order requiring the petitioner to undergo a reassessment evaluation.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before April 29, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s orders of December 27, 2021, and February 4, 2022.

On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in finding that the petitioner waived their right to a preliminary hearing.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before July 21, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioners seek relief from the trial court’s order of January 13, 2022.

On May 3, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the petitioners’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.  The respondent is directed to file a written answer on or before May 31, 2022.  The petitioners have 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the district court's order of February 4, 2022.

On April 4, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the district court did not err in finding that it couldn't review the magistrate's order because it lacked jurisdiction.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before May 2, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioners seek relief from the trial court’s order of January 13, 2022.

On May 3, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the petitioners’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.  The respondent is directed to file a written answer on or before May 31, 2022.  The petitioners have 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from both the magistrate’s order of February 11, 2021, and the district court’s order of April 28, 2022.

On May 20, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why (1) the magistrate did not err in modifying parenting time, and (2) the district court did not err in denying the petitioner’s motion for a mediation exemption.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before June 17, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of February 3, 2022.

On February 11, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in dismissing the petitioner’s petition for lack of standing.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before March 11, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

On December 30, 2021 the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in ordering therapeutic visitation between the subject of the dependency and neglect proceeding and his younger siblings, who are not subject to the dependency and neglect proceeding.  The Court directs respondents to limit their briefing to whether the trial court has jurisdiction to enter this order.  Respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before January 13, 2022.  The petitioner has 14 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.