The petitioners seek relief from the juvenile court’s order of July 28, 2022.

On September 1, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the juvenile court did not err in granting Mother’s motion for a directed verdict.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before September 29, 2022.  The petitioners have 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court's Order of November 16, 2022.
On January 17, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress.  The respondents are directed to file a written Answer on or before February 14, 2023.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the Answer within which to Reply.

Opinion issued October 16, 2023

The petitioners seek relief from the trial court’s orders of June 30, 2022, and July 27, 2022.

On August 23, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in (1) setting aside the default judgment, and (2) granting the defendant’s motion to change venue.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before September 13, 2022.  The petitioners have 7 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of May 27, 2022.

On June 14, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for change of venue.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before July 12, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s orders of August 15, 2022, and September 2, 2022.

On September 7, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in (1) denying the petitioner’s motion to quash a subpoena requiring him to sit for a deposition, and (2) denying the petitioner’s motion for a protective order.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before October 5, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of August 1, 2022.

On August 10, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in refusing to require the plaintiff to appropriate funds to pay the defendant’s attorney’s fees.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before September 7, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply..

The petitioner seeks relief from the district court’s order of January 13, 2022.

On April 1, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the district court did not err in adopting the magistrate’s order requiring the petitioner to undergo a reassessment evaluation.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before April 29, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s orders of December 27, 2021, and February 4, 2022.

On June 23, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in finding that the petitioner waived their right to a preliminary hearing.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before July 21, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioners seek relief from the trial court’s order of January 13, 2022.

On May 3, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the petitioners’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.  The respondent is directed to file a written answer on or before May 31, 2022.  The petitioners have 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the district court's order of February 4, 2022.

On April 4, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the district court did not err in finding that it couldn't review the magistrate's order because it lacked jurisdiction.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before May 2, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioners seek relief from the trial court’s order of January 13, 2022.

On May 3, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in denying the petitioners’ motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction.  The respondent is directed to file a written answer on or before May 31, 2022.  The petitioners have 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from both the magistrate’s order of February 11, 2021, and the district court’s order of April 28, 2022.

On May 20, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why (1) the magistrate did not err in modifying parenting time, and (2) the district court did not err in denying the petitioner’s motion for a mediation exemption.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before June 17, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of February 3, 2022.

On February 11, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in dismissing the petitioner’s petition for lack of standing.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before March 11, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

On December 30, 2021 the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in ordering therapeutic visitation between the subject of the dependency and neglect proceeding and his younger siblings, who are not subject to the dependency and neglect proceeding.  The Court directs respondents to limit their briefing to whether the trial court has jurisdiction to enter this order.  Respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before January 13, 2022.  The petitioner has 14 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court's order of December 13, 2021

On January 12, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in granting the respondents relief from the prior adjudiciation and dispositional orders.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before February 9, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of May 1, 2022.

On May 6, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in dismissing the amended complaint.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before May 20, 2022.  The petitioner has 5 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s orders of June 5, 2021, and September 29, 2021.

On October 22, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in (1) finding that the defendant had waived attorney-client privilege, and (2) ordering the Public Defender’s Office to comply with a subpoena duces tecum.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before November 19, 2021.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s order of September 29, 2021.

On November 22, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in requiring the petitioner to make either a pretrial disclosure or an offer of proof regarding her planned alternate suspect defense.  The respondent is directed to file a written answer on or before December 20, 2021.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the trial court’s orders of August 2, 2021, and August 30, 2021.

On September 22, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in finding that the petitioner does not qualify for representation by the Public Defender.  The respondents are directed to file a written answer on or before October 20, 2021.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.

The petitioner seeks relief from the magistrate’s order of December 15, 2021.

On December 23, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a rule to show cause why the trial court did not err in partially denying the petitioner’s motion to disqualify plaintiff’s counsel.  The respondent is directed to file a written answer on or before January 20, 2022.  The petitioner has 21 days from receipt of the answer within which to reply.